Aristotle and Dante Discover the Secrets of the Universe by
Benjamin Alire Saenz is a book about a friendship between two boys
that end up falling in love with each other. The book is about way
more than just a gay relationship. It is a coming-of-age story told
in in first-person through the eyes of Aristotle (Ari) as he works
through some real adolescent challenges including, but not limited to
his grief over the loss of his brother, an all around anger for most
people and things he encounters, loneliness, and friendship. With
this in mind, it is not surprising that this book would be a good fit
according to the criteria that Logan and associates claim make queer
literature appropriate for the classroom. Amongst these criteria are
curriculum relevance, mirror and windows, and stereotypes, which
Aristotle and Dante Discover the Secrets of the Universe
does meet and therefore, I would
argue it a good fit for use in the classroom (Logan, et al 32-33).
Curriculum relevance is probably one of the most important pieces of
the criteria, as in order for any piece of literature to be used in
the classroom, the educator has to be able to justify how it will be
used to meet state standards and objectives. In the case of Saenz's
book, the teacher could meet standards about determining a theme or
critical idea in the text and analyze its development over the course
of the text, including its relationship to the characters, the
setting, and the plot (ELA.8R.C1.2). The themes in this text coincide
with the character development, especially because the story is told
in first person from Ari's point-of-view. This would lead itself
well to teaching the standard on analyzing how particular lines of
dialogue or incidents in the story reveal aspects of a character or
provoke a decision (ELA.8R.C1.3). Because the story is told in
first person, the reader often has to think outside of the actual
text to infer what is really going on, which would meet the standard
on citing evidence that most strongly supports an analysis of what
the text says explicitly, as well as inferences drawn from the text
(ELA.8R.C1.1). There are two incidents that really stand out for me
where the reader has to make some inferences about what provokes
Ari's decision making and in doing so, the reader takes a deeper look
at the themes in the text.
The first, is when he saves Dante's life. The reader, like Ari,
doesn't know right away what actually happened. One minute Ari is
watching Dante stand in the middle of the street holding a bird with
a broken wing. He sees a car swerving around the corner on the
slippery street after a hail storm (Saenz 111). The reader probably
guesses that Ari pushes Dante out of the way before Ari, himself
knows what actually happens. This is a perfect example of
inferencing, where the clues in the text lead the reader to infer
something. In this case, Ari screaming Dante's name in his head and
the fact that Ari is in the hospital should lead the reader believe
that Ari somehow interfered with the accident. The teacher could
then discuss what made Ari save Dante's life. What motivated him?
This discussion would easily relate to the three WV state standards
cited above – theme, character analysis, and inferencing. This
scene and discussion would also lead itself well to meeting the
criteria of providing students with window and mirror opportunities
that Logan and associates claim is part of the selection process,
which is when the reader sees events through the eyes of the
character or can even see themselves in the character.
The second scene is where Ari decides to seek revenge on those that
beat Dante up after seeing him kiss a boy (Saenz 312-313). Ari
learns that Dante was beat up because he was gay. This scene is very
powerful because again the reader learns before Ari that Dante was
beat up simply because he was gay. The reader also determines that
Ari is going to go start a fight with the assaulters before Ari,
himself, has firmly come to that conclusion. Ari's aggression
towards the boy that Dante was kissing is another piece of this
subplot that could be analyzed. Why does Ari dislike him so much?
Are his actions purely because he's jealous? Why is he jealous? Is
he jealous as just as friend or does he perhaps have stronger
feelings for Dante? Why is he so angry about Dante being ganged up
on because he's gay? Is it only because Dante is his friend or is
there something deeper there? These types of questions would lead to
more discussions that could again address the state standards. The
questions would also be a great opportunity to touch on stereotypes,
which is another criteria of Logan and associates. This type of
literature that encourages conversations about non-stereotypical
characters will enable readers to examine their own attitudes and
beliefs about homosexuality and confront the overt prejudice that
accompanies homophobia (Logan et al 33).
The criteria that Logan and associates list to use when considering
queer literature in the classroom is helpful in providing educators
with a starting place. It is very likely that there may be some
backlash for requiring students to read a book about a gay
relationship and yet, this criteria would give educators a place to
start when justifying to these naysayers. The book is about so much
more than a queer relationship; it's a great story about a boy
coming-of-age and learning how to deal with all the emotions that are
part of growing up. It could be used to meet state standards, it has
deep themes that make the reader think, the characters are
well-developed and bring the reader window and mirror opportunities,
and it breaks down stereotypes about gay adolescent boys. Aristotle
and Dante Discover the Secrets of the Universe would be a great
fit for introducing queer literature in the classroom.
Works
Cited
Logan,
Stephanie R., Lasswell, Teri A. Hood, Yolanda, & Watson, Dwight
C. “Criteria for Selection of Young Adult Queer Literature.”
English Journal. 103.5,
30-41, 2014. Electronic.
Saenz,
Benjamin Alire. Aristotle and
Dante Discover the Secrets of the Universe.
,New York: Simon & Schuster, 2012. Print.
I think you did an excellent job linking this text to the CCSS. You accurately analysed the text and also created a basic plan for using it in the classroom. I also liked your discuss of Ari and Dante after the car accident. That scene really fascinated me while I was reading. It's a complex situation that Ari struggles with. As Ari struggles, so does the reader.
ReplyDeleteAshley,
DeleteI agree that as Ari struggles, so does the reader. It seems that was the author's intent with having the story told in first-person, which is a great teaching point. ;) The car accident scene and all those that follow it really fascinated me, as well. As you know, I didn't know yet that Ari was gay and it was in these series of scenes that I started to suspect as much. I think Saenz did a fantastic job of keeping the reader closely tied to Ari's feelings.